Two Editors Travel to Planet CAD
by Ralph Grabowski

Spatial is selling its soul, ACIS, and I wanted to know why.
Here is my report on two days of meetings with Spatial/PlanetCAD in Boulder CO, October 5-6, 2000.

The one time I saw mountains around Boulder CO, from the Safeway parking lot.



Spatial Technologies is making a radical change in how it conducts business. To help explain where it is headed, the company has been flying editors to its Boulder CO USA head office. Last week, Martyn Day (editor of 'CADdesk AEC' magazine) and myself showed up at Spatial's front door for two intensive days of meetings and meals in great restaurants.

Update 1 (March 2001): Within a few months of our visit, PlanetCAD completely changed its direction. In discussions with potential customers, the company discovered to its horror that customers did not want Web-oriented software hosted on remote servers. (We can't fault PlanetCAD for making that mistake. In Spring 2002, Microsoft underwent a similar awakening with some of its .Net initiatives, when it too discovered corporations don't want their crucial software outside their firewalls.) PlanetCAD tried to change course, by rewriting its Web-server software to run on local servers, and by making acquisitions.

Update 2 (Summer and Fall  2001): PlanetCAD tried hard to push its Precient/QA software that checks MCAD drawings for consistency and for design errors. But PlanetCAD was burning through more than US$1 million a month, with little revenue.  

Update 3 (Spring 2002):  Its board of directors managed to delay a hostile takeover by PCD Investments, a group of shareholders who wanted to take the company private. In a reverse takeover, however, PlanetCAD sold itself to Avocet Solutions, the largest AutoCAD dealership in the USA in May, 2002.


When we arrived on the rainy October 5, I had the following question in mind: "Why would a company sell off its steady revenue stream [ACIS], and embark upon a risky Web venture [PlanetCAD.Com]?"

The answer, I found, is that all is not well in ACISland -- exuberant press releases not withstanding. The revenues from ACIS licenses aren't enough to keep up the pace of development required. Spatial candidly admitted that they could not afford to compete against ParaSolid, which has a sugar daddy (Unigraphic Solutions) to keep it going, even to the point of giving away free licenses. Indeed, Spatial allowed that they had not been signing any new licensees because of the competition.

As for the bidding war between Dassault and SDRC, Spatial really wants to sell itself to Dassault (not SDRC, sorry guys) to get first-hand access to Catia's file formats -- the biggest CAD system in the world. Still, this is not a happy time; as one employee put it, it feels like they are "selling the grandparents." If the sale is approved by shareholders in early November, the company will be split in two, and the split will be physical. The PlanetCAD portion is moving at the end of this week to an office across the street -- a nicer office, they told us -- while the ACIS (or "component software," as they prefer to call it) team stays in the existing two-story office.

CADdesk AEC editor Martyn Day (at left) and upFront.eZine editor Ralph Grabowski (at right).

What is PlanetCAD?

Perhaps the biggest myth about PlanetCAD is that it is a pure Web play. It's not, which came as a surprise to us, since Spatial had been heavily advertising its PlanetCAD Web site, complete with multi-thousand-dollar giveaways.

Michael Hanson, vp of site production, was asked to give us the Big Picture. Here are some of the notes I took on my portable keyboard-equipped Palm III: There are a total of seven agreements between Spatial/Dassault and PlanetCAD handling the ownership of technology, royalties, etc. Among them, PlanetCAD and Spatial will co-own the healing husk technology. PlanetCAD gets a free source code license to ACIS, which would normally cost $250,000 and up.

So if it's not just a Web site, what is PlanetCAD? Mr Hanson explained that "PlanetCAD wants to supply Web infrastructure tools to automate engineering data exchange." Martyn and I rolled our eyes at the jargon, and then asked what that meant. In short, PlanetCAD now has six applications it can offer: Bits2parts, DesignQA, Quote-a-Part, Connect, 3DPublish, and 3Dshare (more details on these next week). The company plans to add more applications in the future, mostly 3D in nature. Missing yet is management of change orders; PDM (product data management) will be via partnering with PDM vendors.

Using the roughly US$25 million they get from selling ACIS, PlantCAD will purchase technology, if necessary. For example, earlier this year they purchased Prescient to get access to its excellent customer base in the automotive and aerospace industries. And how long will that $25 million last? asked Martyn. About 2.5 years, with the aim for profitability in 12 to 18 months.

PlanetCAD.Com, the Web site, is meant for smaller companies and as a marketing tool ("give our software a tryout"). The real money, Mr Hanson believes, is providing server-based software behind the firewall to large corporations worried about the security of their data. As if to drive home the point, when I went to http://www.planetcad.com this evening, I got a "The URL you are searching for is either invalid or there is an error with the server" message.

PlanetCAD sees RedSpark and Alventive as some of its competitors. And yet, it plans to work with them via "coopetition."

ASP hosting -- like Buzsaw -- is required because a license for for off-the-shelf ASP software -- with prices like $250,000 -- is currently too expensive to offer behind a corporate firewall. (In time, prices may come down.) PlanetCAD, for this reason, spent US$2 million to develop their own behind-the-firewall Web software 100% in-house, specific to the engineering market and strong enough to handle 60MB Catia files.

The name "PlanetCAD" may be changed -- after we berated the staff over the name. Martin didn't at all like the name, while I thought it sounded too much like a comic book superhero: Captain Planet CAD! Changing the name is problematic, however, since they've already made up all sorts of marketing stuff, like PlanetCAD-branded T-shirts, fleece jackets, and Frisbees. It hasn't helped that Spatial has been changing the brand names of some of its products, leading to further confusion.

PlanetCAD is a company in transition. "ACIS" and "3D" are words no longer used around the new company. They could even use ParaSolid -- now that it's free <g>

Design QA

Tad Scheiblich showed us Prescient, which is a design model quality checking package. PlanetCAD acquired Prescient in May 00, and is renaming it "Design QA" along with a number of additional products -- GeometryQA, DriveQA, CertifyQA and AuditQA. Geometry QA, for example, handles some issues of manufacturability.

The software allows an engineering department get a benchmark for their solid modeling efforts. They check things like layers, minimum radii, self-intersecting surfaces, and has some ability to do automatic repairs. If, however, the standards are set up incorrectly, it can lead to false error messages.

The software works inside of Unigraphics, Catia, and Pro/E; the next version will support AutoCAD. A Web version being developed. It does not, ironically, read SAT files (output by ACIS). It will be licensed on a monthly subscription at US$7,000 per 100 users.

Tad Scheiblich showing Prescient to Martyn Day and myself (behind the camera).
We editors took notes on folding-keyboard-equipped Palm computers.

 

PlanetCAD Connect

Mr Scheiblich next showed us PlanetCAD Connect (currently called CADCast), a product originally developed by Freightliner (who called it Data Express). This software "automates the distribution of data throughout the supply chain" or, in a more understandable "the digital FedEx." All of the following tasks are done via the Web:

Connect will eventually be all tied together with PlanetCAD, plus other services, such as purchasing, an API for the future. To be released in November '00. Cost is US$10,000 for the implementation and configuration, plus US$2,000 per server (~100 users) .

3DShare

Ken Feitz, customer care manager for PlanetCAD, showed us 3D Share. This software performs translation and healing of 3D solid models; one version runs on Web site, another on local servers. "Healing" means that the software fixes mistakes in translated solid models. It can directly translate IGES surfaces, SAT, STEP, Pro/E, and Catia to a maximum filesize of 60MB; it does not support assemblies, IGES B-rep solids, Pro/E 2000i (because it is encrypted), or 3D wireframe. They are finding that the most popular translation is getting Catia data into Autodesk mechanical products.

Mr Feitz said that most files are translated and healed automatically by their software; other files need hand tweaking; and about 12-15% of files cannot be fixed, or have at least one failed surface. Typical price is US$75 to US$100 for a typical 3-4MB model, which is cheaper than healing by hand. Typical turnaround time is about four hours.

I asked about legal liability of 3DShare making changes to a customer's design. When you submit your model to 3Dshare, you have to agree to waive liability of PlanetCAD.

Bits2Parts.Com

Leif Johnson, product manager for Bits2Parts.Com, demo'ed us his software, which does quotations for EDM, service providers -- an all-in-one location. He emphasized that this service does not do online auctions, and that it software is not yet live; it is currently in an open beta. When live, service providers pay US$99/mo plus 1.5% to 3% per job to a maximum limit; users have free access. There are 350 serivce providers in USA alone; B2P is qualifying them, then hopes to go international. No limit to upload filesize; files are stored on PlanetCAD's servers.

ACIS v6.3

The two days of meetings ended with members of the ACIS team: Michele Dethier, marketing manager and Phil Spreier, product management. I wondered whether ACIS might disappear within Dassault? After all, this will be Dessault's 4th solid modelling kernel; it could be like Visio being swallowed up by Microsoft and becoming a minor product.

Spatial's goal is that ACIS will eventually displace Parasoloid in SolidWorks. There would be some saving in not paying royalties to UGS. Martyn Day asked whether Autodesk might have been the logical purchaser of ACIS, since they are the largest licencee of ACIS. The response was that Dassault actually has experience, since they already own several modelers. I suppose it could have been possible for UGS to

As for the next release of ACIS,120 v6.3 will no longer (1) leak memory; (2) crash your app; and (3) and cause regression (things that work, but no longer works). Immediate concern is to create the highest-quality modeler, since ACIS already has many features.

Martyn Day is surprised by the 4-cheese, Boulder-style pizza ordered at The Med restaurant.


Return to My Travelogues

(c) Copyright 2000 by XYZ Publishing, Ltd.