|
Interview first
posted
|
q & a
five minutes with |
|
CADLandia
|
Aniello Annunziata is the content director manager of CADLandia, which also produces the Italian Edition of upFront.eZine. He interviewed some of the players in the Italian AEC CAD market to find out their reaction to Autodesk's purchase of Revit, and what that might mean to them.
He also contacted Nemetschek Italia (AllPlan and VectorWorks Architect) and Bentley Italia (MicroStation Triforma), but received no reply. - - - CADLandia: Revit uses SBM (single building model) technology. Do you think it is only a technological philosophy, or it is a powerful improvement in productivity? Istvan Toth: SBM is only a variant of our "virtual building" that we introduced ten years ago. We are sure that the methodologies are different, but we will see if it really has new capabilities, or is only marketing. Valerio Da Pos: Revit uses a parametric, mechanical-based
approach to AEC design. And that is to be expected, because the
developers came from PTC. Mario Iannelli: I am not familiar with SBM. If I spend time learning all those American acronyms and abbreviations, I cannot do my work!
CADLandia: When Autodesk decided to purchase Revit, many analysts felt that Autodesk had became the company with best market share and best technology. Do you think that there is space for competitors? What about developers of AutoCAD and ADT add-ons: can they have a share of the market? Istvan Toth: Actually Revit does not have a significant market share. So Autodesk doesn't gain market share with this acquisition. Valerio Da Pos: I think that Autodesk bought Revit
for the American market, because in US there is much speculation
about Revit. Revit is a software package over which there is a lot
of talk, but not many people use it. I think that there is a market
for competitors, especially in Europe. Mario Iannelli: I think that there is always space for competitors who show powerful and innovative solutions. But it is not possible to have a monopolist in application software; it is not possible that one software can solve all designs needs of architects in the world!
CADLandia: Do you think that Revit will survive the acquisition, or will its technology be merged into ADT? Is ADT on its deathbed? Istvan Toth: Only Autodesk can answer that question. Valerio Da Pos: I don't think that Revit technology will be added into ADT. We have to see how many original Revit developers join Autodesk, and with how much responsibility. And then we can see if Revit can be software or a toolkit. These days, ADT looks like a platform rather than stand-alone software. Mario Iannelli: I do not think that the market is as interested in ADT as Autodesk thinks, so Autodesk may consider modifying its strategy.
CADLandia: How do you think the Italian market will react? Who has the advantage with this new asset? Istvan Toth: I think that advantage is for companies like Nemetschek and Graphisoft/Cigraph, who have worked hard for 20 years clearly serving their customers, release by release, solution by solution, without jumps and without pain. Valerio Da Pos: I think that Revit will help AutoCAD
grow its market share. The value of the growth is a function of
integration between ADT and Revit. But I think that another factor
is another of Autodesk's marketing strategies: software by subscription
or by license. Mario Iannelli: I think that this acquisition will have little impact on the Italian market.
CADLandia: How do you do to keep your customer base, and acquire new customers? Istvan Toth: The introduction of Revit in Italy does not change our strategy. Valerio Da Pos: I believe that this makes a new opportunity for ArchLine XP. Italian customers do not buy with closed eyes a software package or because the brand name comes from the USA. If someone thinks that, he is wrong. Customers want solutions at their problems, so they will try software that solves their problems. Mario Iannelli: Our customers ask us to upgrade at our software, and we can continue to do it for them. The only way to acquire new customers is to show that with our solution, they are more competitive on real projects. For example, our customers are asking us for the capability to use architectural design for DOCFA 3 planning, and in a short time we offer this solution. Do you think that ADT and Revit will spend much time on this option?
|
|
Return to www.upfrontezine.com.
|
Entire contents copyright ©2002 by upFront.eZine Publishing, Ltd. All rights reserved worldwide. Article reprint fee $500. All trademarks belong to their respective holders. "upFront.eZine," "Talking About CAD," and "On your desktop every Tuesday morning" are trademarks of upFront.eZinePublishing, Ltd. Letters to the editor may be reproduced in an edited form for clarity and brevity. Opinions expressed in letters are not necessarily shared by upFront.eZine Publishing, Ltd. |