prev

issue #309
17 September 2002

next

 


t a l k i n g   a b o u t   c a d 


Contents

Editorial: Why are Trade Shows Hostile to Students?

- - -
Readers React: Protection of Proprietary Programs Problematic
- - -
Unsubscribe: The Editor Scratches His Head
- - -
Below the Radar
and other regular columns

-
- -
Donation
- - -

 

     

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Why are Trade Shows Hostile to Students?

Editorial by Terry Wohlers

Why don't more design and manufacturing shows and exhibitions put out the welcome mat for students? I understand clearly that in the short term, they are not the buyers, but in a short few years, they ARE the buyers. A 14-year old in 1990 is now a 26-year old working for an organization that might be considering your products and services.
        I recall attending a large exhibition in St. Louis as a junior in college and the impact that it had on me continues to influence my thinking.
        Earlier this month, hundreds of students were invited to attend the International Manufacturing Technology Show in Chicago IL USA. There they discovered high-tech manufacturing processes, systems, and technology that they might never see in a classroom or their hometown.
        According to the IMTS press release, "Exhibitors designated as 'student-friendly' welcomed teachers and students. They eagerly embraced the opportunity to showcase their industry and technology, and to explain to students the well-paying, rewarding, safe career opportunities in manufacturing.
        "There is technology at the show that has never been -- and may never be -- exposed to the public eye: water cutting metal like butter; lasers turning rolls of steel into intricate designs; highly sophisticated machines run by computer numeric controls; robots gracefully moving through synchronized manufacturing processes; fuselage made of light, durable composite material for reduced construction costs."
        IMTS encourages teachers to bring students from a range of backgrounds -- from machine shop and applied arts to math, and science -- because retirement will rob the employed from manufacturing technology during the next decade. <http://www.IMTSNET.org>

Another thought: I see a tremendous amount of energy and excitement among those who are currently enrolled in school. Rarely does a day go by that I don't receive an e-mail from a student. These young people are probing deeply into how they might contribute or somehow get involved in CAD, rapid prototyping, or a related area. We need to harness this energy and put it to work for their benefit and the benefit of the industry.
        I encourage all conference and exhibition planners to involve our youth in their events. These people are also future exhibitors and conference attendees.

Terry Wohlers is principle of Wohlers Associates <http://wohlersassociates.com>.

- - -

The editor replies:

I don't understand it, either. The excitement of the show would make today's media-oriented children consider CAD, CAM, GIS, CAE, etc.
        Last spring, I fought (via email) to bring my daughter with me onto the A/E/C Systems show floor in Anaheim. Penton gave me a series of silly reasons, such as an exhibit might fall over on her (if it fell on me, it wouldn't be a problem, presumably). Penton finally offered to watch my daughter for me while I was on the show floor; I appreciated the offer, but that wasn't the point. Shows like AEC Systems are about networking, and I wanted my daughter to meet the people and companies with whom I work.
        I did take her into the registration area, where she could see nearby exhibits. A security guard tried to get her to leave, but I argued with him forcefully until he gave up.
        The only reason to ban children is if they were unruly. OTOH, considering the antics of some booth personnel...
        In this day of the dying trade show, I would think show organizers would embrace customers of all ages, and especially the Web-savvy youth who will look with puzzlement at "Save $25 - Register Now" fliers they may get by mail in future years.

 


Readers React:

Protection of Proprietary Programs Problematic

Finally! I write an editorial everyone disagrees with. Here's what you had to say:

"I NEVER write to discuss editorials, but this was the biggest bunch of baloney I have read in a long while.
        "Autodesk OWNS their software, therefore they can give it to whomever they choose. General Motors sometimes gives away cars -- does that make it OK to STEAL one? Big difference, right?
        "<step down off soap box> Wow, that article really struck a nerve with me!"
        - Dennis Helmick

"Are you saying  that the fact that some people choose to give some of their stuff away for  free, sometimes, means that everyone has to give everything away for free, all the time?
        "I and other part-time idealists are delighted that Open Source works as well as it does. But most Open-Source enthusiasts are libertarians -- not anarchists or socialists. Property is inextricably related to liberty; what's mine is mine, what's yours is yours, and we are free to dispose of it as we wish -- including draconian EULAs [end user license agreement], if we think it good.
        "The 'ownership of intellectual property' argument has many sides, but you haven't represented any of them in a way I can understand. All you have said is that I was wrong to say that the theft of SolidWorks' source code is 'unquestionably wrong.' I can't find any support for your statement in your missive."
        - Joel Orr

The editor replies:
"I recognize that I did not make clear that the editorial was an set of alternative-universe musings. First, the history: SolidWorks contract GSSL to look for bugs; the sourcecode is copied onto a pair of CDs by a (now former) GSSL employee; the American public pays for the FBI to fly to India and assist the CBI in arresting that person.
        "Now, the what-if scenario: What if instead of paying GSSL to debug the software, SolidWorks declares it open source to allow anyone hunt for bugs? It cost the US taxpayer a bunch of money to have the FBI sting this guy in India; if SolidWorks had decided its source code were open, this need not have happened. Just a thought experiment on my behalf.
        "Autodesk has a strong anti-piracy message, yet confuses it by giving away software in the world's second-worst nation for piracy -- no doubt those 10,000 will be further pirated -- when the 10,000 licenses could have been better used by recession-suffering firms in Autodesk's own backyard."

Mr Helmick replies:
"I believe Autodesk knows that sending software to China is not helping with anti-piracy. I assume they consider that the piracy in China will happen regardless, so they may as well benefit by getting a press release out of the deal. As you know, they have no way to recoup their losses in China, but in the US they can, so giving away 10,000 licenses in North America just means lost revenue. Giving them to China is 'humanitarian'."

"There are two problems [with trying to sell the SolidWorks sourcecode to a competitor]. (1) Anything remotely based on stolen source code would be legally tainted, and couldn't be sold in any economically developed country. (2) And the process of reading and understanding source code enough to maintain it is very difficult.
       "Years ago, I think it was at A/E/C Systems, a company showed an AutoCAD clone. Several folks recognized it immediately; there were too many idiosyncrasies to hide. Suffice it to say, the product was never seen again."
        - Evan Yares

 


Unsubscribe: The Editor Scratches His Head

 

Upon occasion, readers unsubscribe, most often due to change of job or life status. Other reasons, however, have left me scratching my head:

"unsubscribe upfront"
        - Mr. Science
        All Knowing, All Seeing
        Master of Time, Space and Matter

"Thanks -- just not all that interested in CAD."
        - Architect

"Although I like getting this newsletter, my company does not like employees getting email from outside sources."

"It is through no fault of yours that it is not of benifit [sic] to me. If you write any AutoCAD (or other) manuals please let me knoe [sic]."

"I have little interest in Autodesk products."

"The reason we are not interesting."

"I don't do CAD and I'm not interested in following it."

"I am unsubscribing because I am going into the hospital for surgery and will not be able to get at my e-mail for awhile."

"I work nights and am not in the office."

"I am getting into an intense project and I am trying to simplify demands on my time."

"Project, subject interest over."

"Sorry but you [sic] Tueday [sic] e-zine is designed for people who have some say in how their company spends $. I have no say, and my company has very little money to spend."

"I am an engineer and not a full time AutoCAD user, and not a decision maker in CAD related decisions."

"Je ne suis plus intéréssé par le monde de la CAO DAO. Changement d'orientation professionnel."

"it's more difficult because your e-magazine is not in a french language."

"I'm unsubscribing because I don't know one end of CAD from the other."

 


below the radar

A summary of CAD industry news you may not have read elsewhere, or that I find interesting:

Archway has begun representing GMD's line of MicroStation utilities that improve productivity and help enforce (badly needed) standards. Functions include: file fixer, batch EDG, change files to conform to standards, prepare files for translation. and more. A whole package is available at US$1,500.
        Also from Archway, Walkinside for MicroStation includes a little man called Tony walking about like a video game. He walks, runs, sidesteps, or jumps, and he avoids obstacles. Viewer is free; Viewer Pro is US$995; and the full package is US$5,500. http://www.archwaysystems.com

Discreet is shipping Autodesk's first Linux-based software. "burn" is the name of a background rendering program that runs on a farm [collection] of computers running Red Hat Linux 7.2. http://www.discreet.com [Linux has become popular in the computer animation world, and so Autodesk is following suit.]
        In other Autodesk news, Architectural Studio is now available in several European languages. http://www.autodesk.com/archstudio
        Buzzsaw Professional provides access to standard and customized construction forms at a higher annual cost than "standard" Buzzsaw. [Note to the Buzzsaw Webmaster: remember to update the home page copyright date to 2002.] http://www.buzzsaw.com

Hibbitt, Karlsson & Sorensen says its ABAQUS v6.3 advanced finite element analysis software will ship in September. http://www.abaqus.com

Cimmetry System's AutoVue will be integrated with Documentum 5. http://www.cimmetry.com

Pro/ENGINEER and Pro/MECHANICA Student Editions are combined as a single title called "Pro/ENGINEER Student Edition Suite" (US$149.98), and reduced in price from US$399. http://www.ProEStudent.com  [this URL was "temporarily down for a system upgrade" when I checked at Thursday noon.]

X-keys Programmable keypads for CAD applications store key sequences and combinations. http://www.xkeys.com

The AuditDWG auditing tool for AutoCAD 2002 drawings is now available as freeware from http://www.afitec.com [site is French and English intermingled].

The http://www.softcover.com  site has been updated with free demo downloads of Scan2CAD (raster to vector converter), CAD2View (CAD drawing viewer, redliner, converter and print plot utility), Parts&Vendors (parts list manager and supplier database), Squiggle (drawing squiggler), Cutting Schedule (cutting optimization software) and Rhinoceros (NURBS 3D modeling software).

 


People/Companies on the Move

TenLinks.com  is reporting that Advanstar Communications laid off Art Liddle, the (now former) editor-in-chief at 'CADalyst' magazine. He joins a number of CAD journalists who have been recently let go, or are shopping around their resumes in anticipation of being let go from a variety of print and Web publications.

IMSI appointed William Bush as chief financial officer. Mr Bush is the former director of business development for Buzzsaw.com and former corporate controller and finance manager for the AutoCAD product division at Autodesk.


Computer News Summaries

Version 9.1 of DirectX, Microsoft's program to lock gamers to its operating systems, is due to appear in Spring 2003. - The Inquirer

Mozilla no longer is simply an open-source browser. It's a framework for cross-platform apps across the Web. OEone, for example, is software built on Mozilla that uses no menu bar <http://oeone.com/products/screenshots.html > - http://www.salon.com

Microsoft has dropped plans to offer Office XP on a subscription license after trials in Australia, New Zealand and France showed customers found the model confusing. The company (again) blamed customers for the failure.  

 


Market News

Bricsnet has asked Nasdaq Europe for a three-month extension as it attempts to comply with the stock exchange's minimum financial criteria. If compliance is not regained by November 30, disciplinary proceedings with a view to delisting of the Company's financial instruments may be initiated and a trade halt may be imposed.

 


The WorthWhile Web

http://www.3DCad.it
An Italian MCAD portal
        - submitted by Domenico Mazzone

http://research.microsoft.com/~mbj/Smiley/Joke_Thread.html
The discussion thread that developed the :-) emoticon.

 


Letters to the Editor

Re: CAD Data Standards Should Not be Free

"Mr Roberts made a couple of incorrect assumptions. First, about successful implementations, I encourage the readers to review information available at [in PDF format]:

http://www.iso.org
http://www.epmtech.jotne.com
http://www.epmtech.jotne.com/newsletter

Without a standard that contains a high degree of semantics, you may have situations like the scenarios discussed at http://www.eaijournal.com/PDF/AugustCoverStory.pdf
        "If you want to exchange data, you don't start by developing a PC, then an operating system, later a programming language, eventually an application to say that I am now ready to do data exchange. The fact is, if you want to implement these standards, you ask a vendor to support you."
        - Kjell Bengtsson

"I keep reading about all the problems with various standards. Those may become minor problems when Microsoft puts their Palladium system in place. This concept will do wonders for networking!!
        "But the basic thing I have never understood is why someone with the technical ability, which I do not have, has not written a COMPLETE Wine [Windows emulator] system to TOTALLY emulate the Microsoft operating system. This would eliminate many of the political/technical problems with Microsoft and would be open source. Surely, it's not that big of a job to combine all of the Wine programs together add missing pieces to have a total system that will also run the Microsoft software of all types."
        - Bob Wright

The editor replies: "Microsoft has kept secret some of its APIs (the code that lets software programs interact with the operating system). Until now, it used its unique knowledge of APIs to allow its own applications to outperform those from competitors' -- whether a word processor, a Web browser, or whatever. Keeping the APIs secret is like keeping a printer's data connector secret, so that it can't be hooked up to just any computer.
        "Now that the court has found Microsoft to be a monopoly, the company required to reveal all its APIs, which it is doing slowly. Once the APIs are revealed, then projects like WINE may go to completion.

        "The other problem, however, is complacency. Most users are content with what Microsoft ships -- sort of like watching tv and eating at McDonalds -- and don't grok the concept of rebelling."

 

Re: Fed Up!

"I have one word for Mr. Martyn Day: UNSUBSCRIBE! He sounds like all those whiney people complaining about TV. They're too lazy to turn off the tube, and do something constructive; they prefer to watch and complain.
        "It's a growing form of psychosis these days. If Martyn is so upset about how many ezines he's getting, he should unsubscribe or get a new email address. How helpless can he be???"
        - David Stein

Martyn Day replies:

"I didn't subscribe in the first place, they just put me on an email list.
        "Change my email?? Huh? Based on that hint: Someone rang my mobile [cell phone] yesterday, it was the wrong number. So I bought a new phone and now nobody rings me."

The editor replies:

"We editors feel compelled to read as many ezines as our brains can handle, in order to keep up with industry news. Changing our email wouldn't work: how would our readers contact us?"

 

"Many thanks and keep up the excellent work."
        - Aidan O Donnell

"Thanks for a wonderful newsletter!"
        - Glenn Smith

"Thanks for the info -- most interesting."
        - Dudley M. Jones

 

Spin Doctor of the Moment

"That is a violation of federal law that you guys knowingly took those items on an airline."
        - Chris Nardella, United Airlines spokesperson complaining about journalists who were able to pass easily though airport security with banned items. http://www.canada.com

 


Notable Quotable

"Trustworthy Computing means never having to say you screwed up."
        - Thomas Green
        
http://www.theregus.com/content/4/26272.html

 

Return to www.upfrontezine.com.

Entire contents copyright ©2002 by upFront.eZine Publishing, Ltd. All rights reserved worldwide. Article reprint fee $500. All trademarks belong to their respective holders. "upFront.eZine," "Talking About CAD," and "On your desktop every Tuesday morning" are trademarks of upFront.eZinePublishing, Ltd. Letters to the editor may be reproduced in an edited form for clarity and brevity. Opinions expressed in letters are not necessarily shared by upFront.eZine Publishing, Ltd.

 


donations

This e-newsletter is shareware. You may read this free. If you would like to support the author in his work, I suggest a donation of US$25.00 to PayPal in the account of grabowski @telus.net. Click here to make payment.

Make your donation via PayPal.