Issue #58: 6 May, 1997
Our Second Anniversay!
Prev: Upfront #57
Curr: Upfront #58
Next: Upfront #59
A Summary Rebuttal to
"CAD Compatibility: An Independent Report Card"
Autodesk last month released a white paper entitled, "CAD Compatibility:
An Independent Report Card." It appears to
show that of six under-$500 CAD products tested, only AutoCAD LT Release
2 and LT for Windows 95 are 100% round-
trip compatible with AutoCAD's DWG file format. The study included these
four competing products: Corel Visual CADD
v2.0, IMSI TurboCAD 2D v3.0, Intergraph Imagineer Technical v1.0, and Visio
Technical v4.1.
The study's thesis is: "Can CAD professionals be confident that
the files they deliver and exchange are
identical?" We agree this is a question of crucial importance. For
the last six years, in our seminars, books,
tutorials, and papers, we have been telling CAD managers that the best
solution to drawing exchange problems is to
use the same CAD system your client uses -- whether AutoCAD, MicroStation,
or whatever.
The conclusion of the study is, "The AutoCAD LT line of
products is the only one in this group [of low-cost CAD
products] that can truthfully make the claim [to read and write AutoCAD
DWG files] because the products rely on the
same native DWG format as AutoCAD itself." The study found that "text
data was the only area of disagreement" between
LT R2 and LT R3.
We don't agree with the report's methodology. We think the study fails
to find many areas of disagreement between
the DWG files created by three (soon to be four) versions of LT and two
(soon to be three) versions of DWG created by
AutoCAD.
The study decided not to test compatibility with drawings created
by AutoCAD R13 since "of the products
tested, only Intergraph Imagineer claimed to read AutoCAD Release 13 files
but it failed...". How did the study forget
about the one other product that claims to read R13 DWG files: LT for Windows
95?
The study ignored the many problems of creating a drawing in R13
and exporting it to AutoCAD R12 or LT R2. As
the study itself notes, "The process of design to realization is never
one-way."
The #1 problem, in our opinion, is that AutoCAD R12 and LT R2 cannot
read a DWG file created by AutoCAD R13 and LT
R3 -- just like the four competitors. The drawing must be translated from
within R13 (or LT R3) -- Autodesk provides
no stand-alone DWG translator.
When the R13 drawing is translated to R12, the list of problems is
so lengthy that we do not have room to describe
them all here. It is sufficient to note that portions of the R13 DWG file
are either erased or converted to simpler
objects -- the very uncertainty the study's conclusion warns against.
Email ralphg@xyzpress.com
for the full version of our rebuttal (all CAD vendors mentioned in the
study received
the full rebuttal earlier). Autodesk's white paper can be downloaded from
http://www.autodesk.com/products/autocad/acadlt/wpsynop.htm
upFront.eZine Starts Its 3rd Year
This issue marks upFront.eZine's second anniversary and the
start of our third year. The newsletter is now published in
English and German. It is read by 9,000 (estimated) readers in dozens of
countries around the world: ae, ar, at, au, be,
br, ca, cr, cz, de, dk, ee, es, fr, hk, hu, id, ie, il, in, is, it, jp,
kr, my, nl, no, nz, pt, ru, se, sg, sr, su, uk, us, and za (based on
email addresses containing a country code).
Where is A/E/C CAD Headed?
"When you consider the acquisition of Softdesk by Autodesk, the announcement
that Parametric Technology Corp is bringing
a new CAD product (Reflex) to the A/E/C market and, most recently, the
acquisition of Boomerang Technology by Visio
Corp, one cannot help but wonder, what is the future direction of this
marketplace? You might also wonder what
will happen to other A/E/C software developers?"
To help answer the questions, Eagle
Point Software -- which has done a fair bit of acquisition work itself
-- is
hosting Media Day 1997 on June 2 at its headquarters in Dubuque IA USA.
Eagle Point plans to show how they are using
DLLs, OLE, DDE, MFC, and OpenGL "to bring true solutions to the A/E/C
marketplace."
Get Your Act Together
In a strongly-worded editorial, the editor of Engineering
Automation Report newsletter challenged software vendors to
stop presenting questionable claims in their marketing. Wrote Steven Weisburg,
"...we do not believe any of them
intentionally try to deceive us. Yet..." He goes on to list examples:
-
"Our software is the only one" or "Totally unique"
or "The industry's first."
-
"Our product is now available for Windows NT, 95, v3.1."
-
"We don't do Windows NT."
-
"The software is so easy to learn, you don't even need the manual."
-
"Since our product is Windows-based, new users already know 50%
of the functionality."
-
"Since engineers and designers are smart, they understand the
intricacies of computing and networks that our product needs to work."
-
"The Pro/E Killer!"
-
"Our software is object-oriented, seamless, totally integrated,
and best of breed."
-
"Our product won the ____________ Award."
GIS Software Busts Out All Over
At the annual IGUG (International Intergraph Graphics Users Group) conference,
Intergraph announced its next
generation
GIS product: GeoMedia v1 is now shipping. Intergraph says "GeoMedia
is the first GIS to access native files from other
geographic information systems, including Arc/Info, without the intermediate
step of translating the data." GeoMedia has
advanced spatial data processing via Oracle's Universal Server Spatial
Data Option. GeoMedia lets users build a
custom interface Visual Basic, Visual C++, PowerBuilder, Delphi, Excel,
FoxPro and Access.
At its Geoengineering Summit, Bentley
Systems announced three new GIS tools -- oops, Bentley wants them called
"geoengineering tools":
-
GeoOutlook (US$995) is a manager's tool for querying, basic
spatial analysis, etc.
-
GeoExchange (US$1,495) is a translator that converts ESRI, MapInfo,
and ten other data formats to Bentley's own GeoGraphics format.
-
GeoCoordinator (US$1,496) is projection management based on
Mizar Systems software.
Autodesk naming their GIS software "Autodesk World" has caused
the magazine of the same name to rethink its name. We
expect to see a new launch of what used to be Autodesk World --
the magazine -- in June.
Top 5 Software Sales
In 1996, the top software sellers in the category of retail sales in the
USA were:
1. Microsoft
2. CUC International
3. Intuit
4. The Learning Company
5. Symantec
According SofTrends, consumers in the USA spent US$5 billion on retail
software sales in 1996.
Worldwide Wireless Internet by 2002
Teledesic's "Internet in the Sky" initiative will use
several hundred low Earth orbit satellites to bring Internet
access anywhere on Earth by the year 2002. Boeing will get paid
US$9 billion to be the primary contractor.
CAD and Internet News Headlines
Autodesk: This is the week Jim Quanci, Autodesk Program Manager,
makes it all come together for "Design
Your World
Live." A simulcast to 180
cities on 8 May, Autodesk will show Release 14 to potential customers.
Intel: Tomorrow (Wednesday) Intel introduces the Pentium II CPU,
which operates up to 300MHz and incorporates Level 2
caching. Yesterday (Monday), however, Intel had to react to a potential
bug in the Pentium II.
Lotus: According to Newsbytes, Lotus marketers are urging Australian
computer journalists to use the headline
"Microsoft in Turmoil" due to the advent of network computers,
signaling the end of desktop computing as we now
know it -- according to Lotus.
Visio: SysDraw Software was purchased last week by Visio for US$6.5
million. SysDraw has the world's largest library of
network diagramming shapes.
Xerox: Xerox has filed suit against US Robotics over patent
infringement in the PalmPilot hand-held electronic personal
organizer and its Graffiti software.
Letters to the Editor
We had mucho reaction to the article by Bob
Elman in upFront.eZine #
56 on whether
there was a danger in running CAD software on the Intel Pentium MMX chip.
Here are some excerpts from the email we
received:
"Let's ask ourselves -- is it likely that Intel committed an unbelievably
fundamental and critical design error and
created a chip that is not multitaskable? Puhleeeze. The chances of this
happening are zero. Zero."
-- Matt Richards <mattr@attach.net>
We believe Intel is capable of dumb moves, because they have done
it in the past. Their EMS memory board (remember
those?) was one of the few that did not follow the LIM spec. BTW, "LIM"
is short for "Lotus - Intel - Microsoft." In the
days that we CAD users needed a separate math chip, Intel's FPU design
was inferior by a speed factor of 2x to 3x,
allowing companies like Wytek create a niche market for themselves. --
Ed.
"I would expect the EMMS instruction to be added to the task switch
routine on newer operating systems. Installing an
older version of the OS on an MMX box might not be such a good idea, since
it would not be using this instruction."
-- Joe Biegelsen <jmb@spatial.com>
"There was a 50 clock cycle penalty each time there was a mode switch.
Is this still valid, and if so, how much does
this really impact the CAD user? Does a 200MHz P6 outperform a 200MHz MMX
P6 when using, say, AutoCAD and Word
simultaneously? Curious."
-- Rob Guglielmetti <Rguglielmetti@fmrs.com>
Intel has responded to the "slow" 50-cycle switch time
by stating they will release Pentium MMX CPUs with a faster
switching time this summer. We are pushing Autodesk and the CAD magazines
to take on the task of actually testing the
effects of MMX on multi-tasking CAD and multimedia software. -- Ed.
"How about operations from different vendors running in the same task.
Let's think about two Netscape plug-ins: a VRML
plug-in using FP, a graphics plug-in using MMX. Or let's think about AutoCAD
(using FP) with an embedded ObjectARX
application using MMX. Since the ObjectARX application runs within AutoCAD's
address space and task, it has to reset the
MMX state whenever it passes control back to AutoCAD."
-- Dietmar Rudolph <dietmar_rudolph@compuserve.com>
As for the R14 wishlist, well, it's too late. Autodesk is only accepting
ideas now for R15. Reader David Stein
<dstein@cnu.edu> has these suggestions:
"Re #7 (SlideLib) how about a nice GUI interface to make it [more]
useful?"
"How about extending the umbrella of the DIMxxx
settings as well as the effects of DDIM over LEADER and
TOLERANCE objects as well? Like, wouldn't it be nice to have the Leaders
update when the Dimstyle is updated? I'd like to
use our own 'user' blocks for leader arrowheads too.
"Why doesn't the Select User Arrow Block
section under DDIM offer a BROWSE (for block names) feature to see what
blocks are available in the active drawing?
"I'd like to be able to extrude Splines and
Ellipses. Heck, even be able to give Ellipses thickness would be
nice."
Notable Quotable
"If you think you'd rather live your parents' lifestyle, it is a simple
choice to make. Pare down to one earner per
family, get rid of the second car, quit going on vacations and eating out
so often, forsake the CVR, microwave oven and
27-inch TV, move into a 1,000-square-foot bungalow, and live the life your
parents lived -- on US$21,105 a year. If you
are not prepared to do this, then quit complaining."
-- Peter Shawn Taylor, Saturday Night magazine, May,
1995.
Contact!
-
Subscribe to upFront.eZine for free! Simply send message
subscribe upfront by clicking here
.
-
Return to Contents.
All contents copyright XYZ
Publishing, Ltd. Inc., 1997 and all rights are reserved. No material
may be reproduced electronically or in print without written permission
from XYZ Publishing, PO Box 3053, Sumas WA, 98295-3053, unless otherwise
noted.